A home for Facebookers who don’t get Onion’s jokes
At last someone on Tumblr has begun to document all of those on Facebook who post articles from The Onion as if they were actually true. Behold: Literally Unbelievable.
Shareworthy articles and content syndicated from other sites. These aren’t things I’ve written or necessarily endorse, for the record.
At last someone on Tumblr has begun to document all of those on Facebook who post articles from The Onion as if they were actually true. Behold: Literally Unbelievable.
Access Copyright, the copyright collection society that collects money from universities for people copying written works, has been somewhat controversial. Even putting aside its silly attempt to claim a trademark on the © symbol, it’s also been looking to increase its fees massively (over 1,000% in some cases). Michael Geist has been digging in on some of the numbers behind Access Copyright (something the non-profit does not make easy, since it appears to obfuscate the money flow), and appears to have worked out that less than 10% of the money it brings in goes to authors. You can read his methodology at the link, where there are some important caveats, including some money that’s being held back until the results of a lawsuit are worked out. However, it does seem quite eye opening to find out that the group brought in $33.7 million last year, and only about $3.1 million of that went to authors directly, while $8.7 million went to administrative expenses. Kinda makes you wonder who Access Copyright is really representing.
Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
![]()
Disney’s attempt to trademark “Seal Team 6,” two days after SEAL Team 6 got bin Laden, made the national news as an example of trademark law gone insane. It took a of couple weeks, but Disney came to its senses, realized that it was only going to dig itself in a deeper and deeper hole pursuing this, and has now withdrawn the application. Maybe next time, Disney lawyers will think twice before trying to trademark something so well known.
Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
![]()
Amazon quietly launched an extension to its software download store, adding a range of just over 250 software and game titles for Mac OS X. While Amazon has some major titles that haven’t yet made it into the Mac App Store, its service doesn’t offer all the same conveniences as Apple’s.
Among the 51 games and 201 other software titles available at the time of publication, users can find top titles like Microsoft Office, QuickBooks, Photoshop Elements, Toast, Dragon Age Origins, and The Sims 3, none of which are available via the Mac App Store. In fact, much of the productivity and educational software isn’t in the Mac App Store, while a quick look through the games shows many of the top titles, like Call of Duty, Borderlands, and Civilization, are.
The discrepancy is due to Apple’s requirements for App Store distribution, which includes adhering to strict standards for API use and code signing. Amazon’s downloads store simply requires developers to integrate with Amazon’s payment system and generate license keys when titles are downloaded.
The upside to Apple's approach is that all the licensing is handled via the iTunes infrastructure, connected to a user's Apple ID. Purchased apps are automatically downloaded and installed to a user's computer, ready to use. Updates are also handled directly via the Mac App Store.
Amazon’s store, in contrast, simply downloads a standard software installer; it’s up to users to install the software and enter license codes. The main benefit to end users is that it uses Amazon’s payment system and provides a single source to find and buy the software available instead of searching and using vendors own online purchasing systems. Amazon also stores a copy of any purchases on Amazon Cloud, so you can re-download if needed. Unlike the Mac App Store, however, each software vendor makes its own rules about how many computers on which software can be installed and how many times it can be reinstalled without vendor intervention.
Aside from the operational differences, it’s also worth noting that Amazon calls its service “Mac Downloads Store,” perhaps to avoid additional conflict with Apple over the term “App Store.” Apple is currently suing Amazon for trademark infringement over its Android Appstore. Amazon has argued the term “app store” is too generic, while Apple maintains that it isn’t.
Read the comments on this post